BASF Report 2024

E1 Climate Change1

Please note

The target-relevant Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions data listed in this chapter – unlike the other sustainability-related indicators – is part of the statutory audit and has been audited with reasonable assurance.

The content of this section is not part of the statutory audit of the annual financial statements but has undergone a separate limited assurance by our auditor.

The content of this section is voluntary, unaudited information, which was critically read by the auditor.

As an energy-intensive company, we take responsibility for the efficient use of energy and global climate protection, and are committed to the Paris Agreement. We are determined to follow the path toward climate neutrality and to enable our customers’ green transformation by providing low-emission chemistry.

Our business activities result in the production of greenhouse gas emissions,2 which have a negative impact on the climate. These are emissions from our production, our energy procurement and our upstream and downstream . We are working to achieve a considerable reduction in these emissions along the entire value chain. This also creates opportunities for our business activities: Thanks to our transformation toward climate neutrality, we can increasingly offer our customers products with a reduced Product Carbon Footprint (PCF).

Resilience and scenario analyses

At the same time, we have to position our business in line with the consequences of climate change and to create resilience. As a company that is active in a very wide variety of different regions and business areas, we take a diversified approach to climate change adaptation.

We use our TripleS method (Sustainable Solution Steering, see General Disclosures, Sustainable steering of our product portfolio) to continuously review the resilience of our product portfolio with respect to environmental and social matters. We do this by categorizing our products into different segments. This enables us to quantify and steadily increase the proportion of products that contribute to sustainability. At the same time, products facing substantial regulatory, customer-specific or sustainability challenges are identified and removed from our portfolio within five years.

As part of our business strategy development, we also examine the medium- to long-term resilience of our business models from an ecological, economic and social perspective, and with a view to their impacts, risks and opportunities. As regards climate change, this process only looks at transition risks and opportunities – we analyze physical climate risks and existing resilience centrally for our sites (see Climate-related physical and transition risks). In 2024, we started embedding resilience analysis in our processes to a greater extent. The primary focus here is on our own business. The strategies of our business units are updated on a regular basis. This is done either individually at business unit level or as part of the overarching divisional strategy, and involves specialists from the business unit or operating division concerned and from our central strategy unit. In 2024, we piloted a method to address material topics in the strategies of the business units with a view to the next ten years.3 Depending on the extent of the strategy revision, resilience reviews, regulatory aspects and stakeholder expectations can be included to estimate future market developments. Upstream and downstream value chains can also be taken into account. At the same time, climate-related transition risks are captured as part of our strategic controlling process. For example, this allowed us to identify the influence of emissions trading schemes as a risk and changes in demand for more sustainable products as an opportunity.

We also performed a comprehensive analysis of the resilience of the plants at our largest site in Ludwigshafen, Germany, in the past year. We consider a large proportion of our plants to be well positioned and competitive going forward. A short- to medium-term competition risk was identified for 16% of the plants.4 Specific measures – which can also include their closures – are already being implemented for these plants so as to increase site profitability. We have identified a long-term risk for 6% of the plants, which we address through market-based measures.4

We use a variety of scenarios for future macroeconomic development in our strategy development and risk management (for more information on these scenarios, see Climate-related transition risks). In contrast to the assumptions made when analyzing physical climate risks, the scenarios that we use here limit global warming to different extents. Using multiple scenarios addresses and minimizes uncertainties regarding expected developments and enables us to determine risks associated with different future developments. The chemical industry, which is the start of many value chains, can play a key role in the transformation process. Growing electrification – including of our own plants – will considerably increase the need for energy from renewable sources going forward. At the same time, the use of fossil raw materials will decline and the will become more important.

Our business units regularly analyze the opportunities and risks arising from the scenarios, including, where possible, their financial impacts. In strategy development, scenario impacts are largely examined from a qualitative perspective during assessment. We use a multistage process to review the economic efficiency of investment decisions. The metrics used in this process are calculated for different scenarios, highlighting differences that may affect the decisions. We also use opportunities and risks relating to environmental and social matters to evaluate projects. In addition, we regularly review planned CO2 abatement strategies. We have identified measures when implementing our strategy that will enable low-emission plant operation in the long term. The necessary access to funding as part of the transformation is assisted by our Green Finance Framework.

BASF has published a comprehensive corporate carbon footprint every year since 2008. This reports on all greenhouse gas emissions along the value chain – from raw materials extraction to production and subsequent disposal. We regularly analyze the future development of our emissions. Additional greenhouse gas emissions resulting from business expansion are determined as early as the project assessment phase. We build on these to capture the current and future impacts that our business has on climate change.

Climate change poses challenges for us but also offers opportunities for our business activities that enhance the resilience of our business models. For example, our products and solutions contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in many areas.

We systematically assess physical and transition influences to identify and assess material climate-related risks and opportunities.

When assessing our production sites for physical climate risks, we focus on material sites that make a relevant contribution to our business and our portfolio. The assessment is performed on the basis of climate data from the current Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scenarios, which were compiled together with an external partner. In the process, we focus on a climate protection scenario with a high level of global warming.5 This data helps to analyze the potential impacts that climate change could have on the production sites in the coming decades. Our assessment addresses both current risks and long-term risks with a time horizon of 30 years. If long-term risks are identified, we examine whether they also represent a medium-term risk. Physical climate risks are assessed using geographical coordinates at site level. In a first step, a qualitative assessment is performed and sensitivities to various climate risks are prioritized so as to obtain an initial indication of potential material risks. Sensitivity analysis takes both internal and external factors into account. Internal factors comprise the resilience of plants, infrastructure, operations and services. External factors comprise the external infrastructure, water, energy and raw materials supplies, wastewater treatment and the dispatch of finished goods. In addition, the assessment considers risks affecting the entire site and, where relevant, individual plants or specific parts of the site.

We anticipate that most sites will be particularly affected by increasing heat and drought, whereas some may be faced with heavy precipitation and a few could also be exposed to risks in connection with flooding, hail, water stress and wildfires. Where risks are estimated to be in excess of €10 million, potential material losses are quantified and an adaptation plan is drawn up. Targeted site- and business-specific measures can involve optimizing process flows and infrastructure, for example. Based on our assessment in the reporting year, we consider our sites to be well positioned for climate change. However, the transportation of key raw materials and products depends materially on water levels on the River Rhine, for example, especially in the critical Middle Rhein region. An extreme drought could significantly impact transportation, or even bring it to a standstill. We are currently working to more precisely determine the scope of materiality of this risk and the sites affected. We have already taken measures to counteract this risk (see E3 Water protection, Climate resilience measures).

With respect to transition climate risks and opportunities, global climate policy ambitions and the implementation of relevant measures play a decisive role in the continuing growth of the chemical industry and its customer industries. Consequently, we have worked together with an external partner using an empirical simulation model to define and quantify global long-term scenarios up to 2050 featuring various global warming paths. In addition, a net-zero scenario in the EU and the United States by 2050, and globally by 2060, was also analyzed, which limits global warming to 1.5°C. The fundamental drivers for the scenarios are different societal preferences and, building on these, climate and economic policy objectives. To assess the impact of different global climate policy approaches on our business units, the scenarios are discussed by the business units in workshops. Feedback is incorporated into the ongoing development of the scenarios.

The resulting risks were reviewed for materiality as part of the assessment. Going forward, the material transition risks identified at Group level will be systematically examined by our business units and quantified if possible, and countermeasures will be taken where necessary. Adaptation measures can include modifying our product portfolio, investments in new technologies or enhancing existing technologies.

We continuously analyze physical and transition opportunities and risks arising in connection with the topics of energy and climate protection as part of our opportunity and risk management (for additional information, see Opportunities and Risks).

The double materiality assessment that we performed in 2024 (see General Disclosures, Double Materiality Assessment) resulted in seven material impacts on climate change, plus four material climate-related risks and two material climate-related opportunities for BASF. For information on the relevant time horizons, see the overarching table on the results of the double materiality assessment (see Results of the Double Materiality Assessment).

Results of the double materiality assessment for E1 Climate Change: Impacts

Impacts

Evaluation

Placement in the value chain

Description

Climate-damaging emissions due to the use of fossil fuels in our upstream value chain (Scope 3)

Negative

Upstream value chain

The extraction and procurement of fossil energy causes greenhouse gas emissions, air and water pollution and habitat destruction in our upstream value chain.

Land-use change due to sourcing plant-based raw materials

Negative

Upstream value chain

Our procurement of plant-based raw materials creates an incentive to cultivate certain plants and expand the production environment for material loops. This negatively impacts land use.

Shift to renewable energy and electrification impacts the environment through the use of raw materials such as lithium

Negative,
potential

Upstream value chain

The manufacture and use of renewable energy requires minerals and metals whose mining and subsequent processing could negatively impact the environment. In addition, their mining poses a risk of inappropriate working conditions in some regions.

Climate-damaging emissions due to the use of fossil fuels for our production (Scope 1 and 2)

Negative

BASF’s own operations

Our own production of energy in the form of steam and electricity using fossil fuels leads to emissions of greenhouse gases and other pollutants and thereby impacts the climate and the environment.

Climate-damaging emissions from oil and gas businessa

Negative

Downstream value chain

The oil and gas business in which BASF holds shares causes greenhouse gas emissions during combustion at customers, and leads to environmental impacts in the downstream value chain.

Accelerated transition to climate neutrality through energy transformation

Positive

Upstream and downstream value chain

By investing in renewable energy, we can offer our customers products with a reduced Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) and contribute to the transition toward climate neutrality by reducing upstream emissions.

Innovations as a lever for climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation

Positive

Upstream and downstream value chain

Innovations in chemistry and new technologies can contribute materially to climate change mitigation and adaptation. We use our TripleS method (Sustainable Solution Steering) to manage our product portfolio on the basis of our products’ sustainability performance.

a

On September 3, 2024, BASF transferred Wintershall Dea’s exploration and production business, excluding Russia-related activities, to Harbour Energy plc, London, United Kingdom. BASF continues to hold a material interest in Harbour Energy (see also Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Results of the double materiality assessment for E1 Climate Change: Risks and opportunities

Risks and opportunities

Evaluation

Description

Rising product prices, and/or production costs and/or lower market growth

Negative, transition

Lower-emission production using raw materials with reduced carbon footprints and renewable energy increases production costs and ultimately also product prices. Coupled with societal pressure to consume less, this could lead to lower market growth.

Fragmentation in national and regional climate policy – and thus in the market

Negative, transition

Pronounced differences in the regulatory framework due to divergent regional climate policies pose particular strategic challenges for us as a globally active company.

Regulatory volatility leading to competitive risks

Negative, transition

Political regulations designed to mitigate climate change, such as those set out in the EU Green Deal, could represent a competitive risk for us due to higher costs, for example as a result of administrative effort, and a high level of volatility.

Rising energy costs due to climate-related regulations

Negative, transition

For BASF as an energy-intensive company, risks arise particularly from regulatory changes such as in carbon pricing on emissions trading systems, in taxes and in energy legislation.

Market opportunities through climate-smart products

Positive, transition

Our broad product portfolio includes, among other things, solutions for the circular economy and climate change mitigation. Increasing societal demands and resulting regulations would offer additional market opportunities for these products.

Renewable energy opens up opportunities for cheaper or otherwise more advantageous procurement

Positive, transition

Investments in own power assets and long-term supply contracts reduce dependencies on volatile global markets and lead to comparatively lower CO2 abatement and energy procurement costs.

1 Unless otherwise stated, all metrics in the text comply with the consolidation by financial control approach (see also the disclosures on consolidation for the nonfinancial reporting in General Disclosures). The metrics listed in this section on the target-relevant Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are part of the statutory audit and have been audited with reasonable assurance.

2 The terms “greenhouse gas emissions” and “CO2 emissions” are used synonymously. They include all greenhouse gases in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.

3 The time periods considered in the resilience analysis described here only correspond exactly to those of the transition risk analysis. Our climate protection targets for 2030 are within the period under review. We consider physical climate risks and corresponding resilience over a longer period of time, as these only have an impact in the long term.

4 The figures correspond to the time horizons used by BASF in the course of the assessment (short-term: until 2026, medium-term: until 2030, long-term: after 2030).

5 The assessment model was based on the IPCC SSP5-8.5 climate change scenario (high global warming scenario) as the worst-case scenario.

Strategy and Governance

Climate change is the greatest challenge of the 21st century. Swift and resolute action is needed to achieve the targets agreed in the Paris Agreement. We stand by this responsibility. Climate change mitigation and the transformation of the chemical industry are very important to us and an important part of our corporate strategy (for more information, see Our Strategy).

BASF is taking a step-by-step approach to the green transformation and is combining climate change mitigation with its customers’ and its own success. Our ambition is to be the preferred chemical company to enable our customers’ green transformation. In recent years, we have increasingly invested in renewable energy to power our plants, tested new technologies and deployed alternative raw materials so as to drive forward our transformation and launch more sustainable products with a reduced or a net-zero carbon footprint on the market. This also allows our customers to benefit from our emission reduction measures.

In the future, we will focus even more on the specific opportunities for our business and will prioritize projects for which we see growing customer demand and willingness to pay. The focus will continue to be on projects that secure our license to operate. We will stagger our transformation projects over time in keeping with these priorities. In a first step, we are planning to use greater amounts of bio-based and recycled feedstocks in our existing plants. In doing so, we will make the most of the unique advantages offered by our Verbund. We are expecting demand for more sustainable products to outpace supply in the medium term, leading to profitable growth for BASF. As the markets for more sustainable products grow, we will be in a position to scale up and apply the new technologies that we are currently developing and, in some cases, already piloting. This step-by-step approach to transformation is reflected in our investments: Expenditure associated with the transformation is expected to average €600 million per year between 2025 and 2028. We expect that the majority of major capital expenditures for our green transformation will arise in the period after 2030.

We have established comprehensive management and control systems to minimize negative environmental impacts and protect the environment. Our Responsible Care Management System includes not only Group-wide requirements and guidelines for health and safety (for more information, see E2 Process, product and transportation safety and S1 Occupational safety and health) but also the areas of environmental protection and energy. Our global environmental protection standards serve to assess environmental impacts such as those resulting from CO2 emissions. In addition, we implement the technical, operational and administrative measures needed to control and minimize these impacts, and ensure that we comply with national and local environmental legislation. Our global energy standards are specifically aimed at reaching our Scope 1 and Scope 2 climate protection targets (see Global Targets). In them, we undertake to continuously improve the energy efficiency of our operating procedures by implementing energy management systems, and to drive forward resource-saving and economic production at our sites. Moreover, we have defined general guidelines for optimizing existing energy supply structures and developing new energy supply concepts. These also involve evaluating low-emission and emission-free alternatives such as electricity and steam from renewable sources. We use requirements for systematically collecting and monitoring emissions and energy data as the basis for improving our sustainability performance and managing our climate protection targets.

The Corporate Environmental Protection, Health, Safety and Quality unit in the Corporate Center defines Group-wide management and control systems and monitors compliance with internal requirements and legal regulations, while the sites and Group companies implement these requirements locally. We regularly audit our performance and progress, and hence the effectiveness of our requirements. Our global network enables information and insights to be shared across the BASF Group on a regular basis. Our requirements and guidelines are continuously updated. To this end, we also exchange information with authorities, associations and international organizations. For example, BASF is actively involved in the global Responsible Care® initiative established by the International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA).

We address climate change adaptation centrally through our approach to assessing physical climate risks (see Climate-related physical and transition risks). Based on this, our sites resolve and implement local measures such as adapting logistics to low water as well as flood protection measures. The risks associated with adapting to climate change depend heavily on the geographical location of our sites, site-specific conditions and the underlying regulations in the respective countries, and in some cases differ considerably. An overarching policy therefore does not exist.

We have also established guidelines and requirements for managing our emissions along the value chain, and thus our Scope 3.1 target and the Scope 3.1 emissions for our net-zero target by 2050. Our procurement organization has established a global risk-based management system for our upstream supply chain. We have defined the standards for this in a global procurement requirement. We continuously enhance this requirement and our structures and processes in order to adapt to changing conditions. Our suppliers are required to comply with internationally recognized environmental standards. Our expectations of our suppliers are laid down in the global Supplier Code of Conduct (see S2 Strategy and Governance), which is part of our purchasing conditions. The code is based, among other things, on the Ten Principles of the United Nations Global Compact initiative and the Responsible Care® initiative, and includes the deployment of energy-efficient, environmentally friendly technologies. We endeavor to ensure compliance with these requirements using a multistage control process. In addition, BASF has drawn up principles for the responsible procurement of renewable raw materials, plus standards in relation to Product Carbon Footprints and eco-efficiency analyses with the aim of reducing our products’ carbon footprints.

For further explanations of our overarching in respect of scope of application, accountability, impacts in the value chain, global applicability, accessibility to stakeholders and engagement thereof, see General Disclosures in our Sustainability Statement.

We have laid the foundations for our successful transformation by establishing internal incentive schemes and we are setting up our organization accordingly.

We anchored reducing our Group-wide CO2 emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2)6 as the most important nonfinancial key performance indicator in the BASF Group’s steering and compensation systems back in 2020, giving it even more weight. This is one of three equally weighted (33.3%)7 strategic targets for the long-term incentive (LTI) of the Board of Executive Directors and senior executives. Supervisory Board remuneration does not include any variable components and so is not linked to target achievement.

We used a short-term incentive (STI) program to introduce targets for the senior executives in our operating business units in the reporting year, with the goal being to drive forward the market-driven transformation as part of our new strategic direction. In addition to the financial targets, this defines three further targets: occupational and process safety, sustainability and development of the operating divisions. The first two targets mentioned are sustainability-related. All three objectives are equally weighted in the STI calculation and together account for 25% of the total STI formula. This means that 16.7% of the entire STI formula is sustainability-related. The sustainability target includes elements that contribute to our green transformation, such as sales of our Sustainable-Future Solutions (for more information, see the General Disclosures, Sustainable steering of our product portfolio) or that increase the share of purchased raw materials with supplier-specific Product Carbon Footprints (for more information, see Actions along our value chain).

Our organizational structures are designed in such a way as to permit a market-driven transformation to a more sustainable product portfolio, plus the achievement of our climate protection targets. The Corporate Center unit Corporate Environmental Protection, Health, Safety and Quality, which reports to a member of the Board of Executive Directors, is responsible for our Responsible Care Management System. The Corporate Strategy & Sustainability unit, which reports to the Chairman of our Board of Executive Directors, develops the BASF Group’s climate protection targets and tracks the emission reduction levers aiming at achieving them. The Global Procurement unit, which reports to the Chief Financial Officer, is responsible together with Corporate Strategy & Sustainability for the purchasing processes and procurement requirement relating to our raw materials-related targets. As part of our new corporate strategy, the BASF Renewable Carbon unit within Global Procurement is continuing to drive the sourcing of renewable raw materials and biomass for BASF’s operating divisions. This is the counterpart to BASF Renewable Energy GmbH, the subsidiary that coordinates the procurement of renewable energy.

The Net Zero Accelerator unit, which had focused on emissions reduction projects since 2022, was dissolved as of January 1, 2025, in line with the new corporate strategy. The activities were integrated into existing divisions and service units, ensuring that BASF’s green transformation is aligned even more closely with market trends and that the business can better react to new customer requirements.

Transition plan for climate change mitigation

We are pursuing ambitious climate protection targets. We want to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from our production processes (Scope 1) and our energy purchases (Scope 2) by 25% by 2030 compared to the base year of 2018, and are aiming to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.6 Our target focuses on emissions caused by our production and includes around 96% of our Scope 1 emissions and 99% of our Scope 2 emissions (see Global Targets).8 It is compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5°C based on the emission reduction pathways described by the International Energy Agency (IEA) in its study entitled “Net Zero by 2050.”9 Already today, the emissions intensity of our plants for producing basic chemicals such as ammonia, methanol and high value chemicals is below the values defined by the IEA for 2030.

Above and beyond our own production, we take responsibility for emissions along our value chain. This is why we set ourselves a target for our raw materials-related Scope 3.1 emissions in 2023 that includes around 92% of our Scope 3.1 emissions.10 Raw materials-related emissions from battery materials are initially excluded from the target (see Global Targets, Scope 3.1). By 2030, we want to reduce these Scope 3.1 emissions in relation to the purchasing volume specifically by 15% compared to the 2022 base year (see Global Targets, Scope 3.1). However, the IEA study does not provide a basis for deriving an emissions reduction pathway for these emissions.

To achieve our climate protection targets, we have developed a transition plan11 that shows our emissions reduction path based on the most important levers. We are focusing on the following emission reduction levers12 to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions from our own production and energy purchases (Scope 1 and 2):

  • Renewable energy: We are increasingly meeting our electricity needs from renewable sources (see Actions, Renewable energy).
  • Operational excellence: Our operational excellence activities are continually improving the energy and process efficiency of our plants (see Actions, Operational excellence).
  • Low-emission steam generation: In the future, we will increasingly rely on electrification for steam generation and hence also tap previously unused waste heat potential (see Actions, Low-emission steam generation).
  • Climate-smart technologies: We are developing completely new emission-free and low-emission processes, and are assessing and piloting new technologies for more sustainable chemistry (see Actions, Climate-smart technologies).

Transition plan for climate change mitigation

Million metric tons of CO2 equivalents

Transition plan for climate change mitigation (graphic)
 a Reference target value of a 1.5°C-compliant reduction pathway

Roughly half of BASF’s Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are attributable to energy produced to operate our plants. Scope 2 emissions can be reduced by up to 3.2 million metric tons of CO2 by 2030 using the “renewable energy” lever. Additional emission reductions of up to 0.6 million metric tons of CO2 (Scope 1) are possible in the period up to 2030 using the “low-emission steam generation” lever. In the long term, new steam generation technologies such as heat pumps and e-boilers not only enable emission reduction but will also enable decoupling of highly efficient steam and power generation in combined heat and power plants. The electricity generated from this today can then also be provided using renewable energy. The other half of our Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions arise in our production processes. One way of reducing these emissions is the continuous improvement of our plants (operational excellence). We see a reduction potential of up to 0.6 million metric tons of CO2 (primarily Scope 1), which we aim to achieve by 2030. Furthermore, we are working to develop and implement climate-smart technologies so as to facilitate lower-emission production. This will result in further potential reductions of up to 1.1 million metric tons of CO2 (Scope 1) by 2030. Our emission reduction levers enable the reduction of growth-related CO2 emissions that will be added by 2030, which are associated with organic growth and the investment in our new Verbund site in southern China. All reduction measures implemented are to be regarded as long-term. We will counteract growth-driven emission increases between 2030 and 2050 primarily using the “climate-smart technologies” and ”low-emission steam generation” levers.

The transition plan reflects the market-driven transformation approach set out in our new strategy, which was published in the reporting year and in which we have adopted a step-by-step approach (see also Strategy and governance). In the first phase, we already succeeded in securing access to larger volumes of electricity from renewable energy and tested new, climate-smart technologies. Now, in the second phase, we are focusing on customer needs, on Scope 1 reduction actions offering specific opportunities for our business, and on securing our license to operate. At the same time, we are assessing new business models and new technologies. Major investments in scaling up climate-smart technologies will largely be made in the third phase after 2030.

For the progress made in implementing our transition plan, clustered by the relevant emission reduction levers, see Actions. We evaluate and prioritize specific actions for emission reduction and target achievement on an ongoing basis from an economic and technological perspective. We also continuously analyze our portfolio. Consequently, the representation in the graphic depicts the current status of our planning, but will be updated going forward. We will only consider external offsetting measures for our Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions13 as a temporary measure in the medium term if our activities were not to make the desired contribution to reducing emissions.

As an energy- and emissions-intensive sector, the chemical industry today has a significant amount of potential locked-in greenhouse gas emissions.14 This also applies to BASF and was taken into account when assessing our emission reduction levers. Since significant financial resources will be needed to transform our plants, locked-in emissions from assets jeopardize the achievement of our targets in principle. Potential locked-in emissions are factored into our investment decisions, such as the plans for our new Verbund site in southern China. From 2025 onward, the latter will be supplied exclusively with electricity from renewable sources and will serve as a model for sustainable chemical production.

Few of our products lead directly to CO2 emissions during their use phase. Nevertheless, we also aim to reduce these emissions even further by constantly looking for new, more sustainable solutions (see Product Carbon Footprints) and have already achieved significant emission reductions as a result (see the reduction in Scope 3.11 in Actions along our value chain).

The transition plan is embedded in our financial planning and was approved by the Board of Executive Directors and the Supervisory Board. It is based on investments of around €300 million in Scope 1 measures and €250 million in renewable energies between 2025 and 2028. These are part of BASF’s green transformation expenditure of €600 million each year on average.

In 2024, we invested €59 million (taxonomy-aligned capital expenditures/capex) in constructing a water electrolysis plant for producing hydrogen at our Ludwigshafen site in Germany (see EU Taxonomy, table on capital expenditures/capex).

Furthermore, we invested €149 million, which are attributable to gas-related economic activity (see EU Taxonomy, table on capital expenditures/capex). In addition to investments made to achieve our emission reduction target, we are also investing in steam generation at our Verbund site in Zhanjiang, China, which is under construction. Part of steam production there will come from a natural gas fired boiler, alongside to the future use of process waste heat steam.

BASF has not reported any taxonomy-eligible activities under the climate change adaptation objective. This is firstly to avoid double counting with economic activities that have already been included under the climate change mitigation objective. Secondly, in accordance with the notice issued by the European Commission, a prerequisite for taxonomy eligibility under the adaptation objective is the submission of an investment plan for implementing adaptation solutions; such a plan within the meaning of the Taxonomy Regulation has not been submitted to BASF. In addition, BASF does not have any other targets or plans with which it could adapt its economic activities to the criteria set out in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139. For information on activities under the climate change mitigation environmental objective, see EU Taxonomy.

We are focusing on procurement-specific actions to reduce our raw materials-related emissions (Scope 3.1) and are working closely together with our suppliers (see Actions along our value chain). In recent years, we have been able to considerably increase the data availability and thereby the transparency of our raw materials-related emissions, and aim to steer these more precisely via our resulting Scope 3.1 target.

What is more, we are taking responsibility for our other emissions along the value chain (see Actions along our value chain). Reducing Scope 3 emissions – which account for the majority of our total emissions – presents us with particular challenges, as these are only partly within our own direct sphere of influence and are influenced by a large number of external factors.

We are also increasingly focusing on circularity in the form of renewable and recycled raw materials and raw materials based on the use of CO2 in order to move from linear value creation to closed-loop material cycles (see E5 Strategy and Governance). In future, we will drive forward sourcing of renewable raw materials and deploy a make and buy approach similar to that with which we source renewable energy. Feeding in greater amounts of bio-based and recycled raw materials in our existing plants will allow us to leverage the unique strengths of our Verbund and to offer our customers products with lower Product Carbon Footprints (PCFs).

We use a digital solution that continuously determines the PCFs for more than 40,000 sales products15 (see Product Carbon Footprints) to increase transparency about our product-specific greenhouse gas emissions and focus CO2 reduction measures on those areas where they bring the greatest added value. These PCFs include all greenhouse gas emissions – from raw materials extraction to the finished product leaving the factory gates (“cradle-to-gate”). This lets our customers benefit from lower CO2 emissions in the value chain. In addition, we offer our customers solutions that help prevent greenhouse gas emissions and improve energy and resource efficiency.

Moreover, our TripleS method, which steers the sustainability performance of our product portfolio, is a material element in the process of enhancing transformation topics relating to climate change, energy, resource efficiency and the circular economy (for more information, see General Disclosures, Sustainable steering of our product portfolio). In addition to implementing new regulatory requirements, we are actively driving forward the adaptation and development of new production processes with the aim of reducing the environmental footprint of our products. Criteria for reducing CO2 emissions are a key part of the evaluation process. Products with sustainability concerns are identified and, in the case of severe challenges, action plans are developed to optimize them or replace them with alternative solutions.

All parts of society must work together to effectively protect the climate. The basis is a political and regulatory environment that promotes innovation in climate change mitigation, makes it possible to develop new processes that are competitive internationally and resolutely drives forward the expansion of renewable energies. Our aim is to work together to shape the transformation toward climate neutrality in a socially just manner (). We include the viewpoints of our external stakeholders in our decisions and actions using dialog forums and advisory bodies such as the Nature Advisory Council, which we established together with external experts (for more information, see S3 Contribution to the positive development of communities) and the Sustainability Lab stakeholder engagement format (for more information, see General Disclosures, Interests and Views of Our Stakeholders).

In addition, we support various national and international initiatives and are involved in partnerships. For example, we engaged in close dialog with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) to derive science-based climate protection targets for the chemical sector.

We are committed to reporting transparently on our climate protection targets and progress, as well as on the impact of climate change on BASF. In this context, we support the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). We have also participated in the program established by the international nonprofit organization CDP for reporting on data relevant to climate protection since 2004. The final CDP assessment on climate protection for 2024 was not yet available up to the editorial deadline for the BASF Report 2024.

6 Scope 1 and Scope 2 (excluding the sale of energy to third parties). Greenhouse gases according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, converted into (CO2e).

7 The exact percentage influence on compensation depends on target achievement. For more information, see the Compensation Report at basf.com/compensationreport.

8 Based on the base year 2018

9 The IEA’s Net Zero by 2050 study reflects a scenario that, measured in accordance with the IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C, is consistent with a 1.5°C scenario for 2030 with a low temperature overshoot and with a 1.5°C scenario in which there is no overshoot for 2050.

10 Scope 3.1, raw materials excluding battery materials, excluding services, technical goods and greenhouse gas emissions from BASF trading business. The emissions account for 52% of total Scope 3 emissions based on the 2024 business year. We adjusted the baseline in line with the TfS Guideline in the reporting year due to the availability of further primary data.

11 BASF is not an undertaking that is excluded from the EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks in accordance with the exclusion criteria stated in Articles 12(1), points (d) to (g) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Standards Regulation).

12 No climate scenarios were used to identify the levers. Instead, the levers are based on an analysis of the sources of emissions and the technical means of reducing them.

13 Scope 1 and Scope 2 (excluding the sale of energy to third parties). The emissions account for 96% of total Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions in relation to the base year. Greenhouse gases according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, converted into CO2 equivalents (CO2e).

14 These are future greenhouse gas emissions that are likely to be caused by key assets or products within their operating lifetimes.

15 This includes all BASF products of all A companies and some selected B companies, excluding traded goods. For more information on the Group’s legal structure, see Organization of the BASF Group, Corporate legal structure.

Actions

We consistently align our actions with our climate protection targets, based on a comprehensive analysis of our emissions. The transformation of our company toward low-emission chemistry is closely linked to our customers’ transformation. Our key customer industries are facing enormous challenges in reaching their sustainability-related goals. We supply the chemical products supporting them in this. At the same time, the preconditions for business cases at scale do not yet fully exist. The market readiness, and hence also the speed of green transformation, varies widely between regions and customer industries. Against this background, we are focusing our transformation approach even more single-mindedly on development and on the needs of our various customer markets, which will allow us to concentrate even more strongly on our specific business opportunities. We will prioritize projects for which we see growing customer demand and willingness to pay for low-emission and emission-free solutions. As the markets for sustainable products grow, we will be in a position to finance necessary investments in new production technologies. Equally, we will need qualified staff and service providers to develop, implement and maintain these technologies.

In 2024, we invested €59 million (taxonomy-aligned investments/capex) in constructing a water electrolysis plant for producing hydrogen at our Ludwigshafen site in Germany (see EU Taxonomy, table on capital expenditures/capex). In addition, no significant capital and operating expenses within the meaning of the were incurred in the business year 2024 for the actions described.

Renewable energy

Roughly half of our Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are attributable to our plants’ energy demand. A core component is therefore converting our energy supply from fossil to renewable sources; this applies especially with regard to our electricity supply. In 2024, electricity from renewable sources as a share of total electricity consumption rose further compared with the previous year to 26% (2023: 20%). Our electricity consumption will increase significantly in future due to the planned gradual electrification of our steam generation and the switch from natural gas-based to electricity-based, low-emission production processes. Nevertheless, we aim to source more than 60% of our power needs from renewable sources by 2030.

As regards the transformation of our power supply, we are pursuing a make and buy approach in the short, medium and long term. Firstly, BASF is investing in its own renewable power assets. Secondly, we are focusing on purchasing green power on the market through long-term supply agreements with plant operators, green power purchase agreements or renewable energy certificates, depending on the region and market regulations. Profitability and additionally are key purchasing criteria. The electricity purchased here is primarily sourced from new renewable energy facilities.

In 2024, we successfully advanced our plan for sourcing power from renewable sources. The Hollandse Kust Zuid offshore wind farm, a joint project with Vattenfall and Allianz, was commissioned successively and has been fully operational since the summer of 2024. With 139 turbines and a capacity of 1.5 gigawatts, it is one of the largest subsidy-free offshore wind farms in the world. As part of a further project, we have contractually agreed with Vattenfall to purchase 49% of the shares in the Nordlicht 1 and 2 offshore wind farms. Construction is due to start in 2026, subject to the final investment decision, expected in 2025. The wind farms, which have a total capacity of 1.6 gigawatts, are being built without government subsidies and should be fully operational in 2028. We plan to use just under half of the electricity generated by these two wind farms to supply our production sites in Europe, and particularly Ludwigshafen, Germany. In order to be able to fully supply our Verbund site in Zhanjiang in southern China, which is currently under construction, with electricity from renewable sources in the future, we have entered into a joint venture with Mingyang for an offshore wind farm in southern China, which includes development, construction and operation. The planned wind farm in Zhanjiang in the Chinese province of Guangdong will have a capacity of 500 megawatts and is scheduled to go into operation at the end of 2025, subject to approval.

From the beginning of 2025, our new site in Zhanjiang will be supplied with 100% electricity from renewable sources as a result of a supply agreement with the State Power Investment Corporation (SPIC). In addition to the long-term supply agreement with the SPIC, we have entered into a supply agreement with China Energy Engineering Group Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute (GEDI) to source electricity from renewable sources over a period of 25 years. In 2023 and 2024, we also signed further long-term supply agreements for green power at other sites in Asia, such as our three sites in Jiangsu, China, and six production sites in South Korea. In North America, we were able to secure around 150 megawatts16 of solar generation capacity through virtual power purchase agreements back in 2022. These solar power plants are already operational. Further long-term supply contracts exist with X-ELIO, providing capacity of 48 megawatts of solar power to supply the Freeport, Texas, site and with other developers, providing 33 megawatts of solar power for the Freeport site and more than 35 megawatts of wind energy for the Freeport and Pasadena sites in Texas. In some regions, we have also acquired green power certificates. The aim is to gradually replace these temporary measures with our own power assets or long-term supply agreements.

The carbon footprint of purchased electricity in 2024 was around 0.20 metric tons of CO2 per MWh (market-based approach). For the 2024 business year, we were able to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions by around 1 million metric tons of CO2 by using electricity from renewable sources (for more information on the expected emission reductions, see our Transition plan for climate change mitigation).

In 2024, we started operation of a stationary long-term sodium sulfur-based battery storage system (NAS®) at our Schwarzheide site in Germany, driving forward integration of renewable energy. The system supports the provision of power to individual plants from the site’s own solar park. BASF Stationary Energy Storage GmbH markets the NAS batteries, which were developed by NGK INSULATORS Ltd.

Operational excellence

Through our operational excellence projects, we aim to make our plants and processes even more efficient and resource saving, thereby preventing CO2 emissions. Certified energy management systems according to DIN EN ISO 50001 at all relevant production sites play a particularly important role here.17 These help us to continuously identify and implement potential for improvement in energy efficiency. This not only reduces greenhouse gas emissions and saves valuable energy resources but also increases our competitiveness.

In 2024, we implemented more than 450 measures to reduce energy and resource consumption and increase our competitiveness, which led to a reduction in emissions of around 200,000 metric tons of CO2 (for more information on the expected emission reductions, see our Transition plan for climate change mitigation). For example, optimizing process technology and energy usage at several plants at our Antwerp, Belgium, site has enabled us to prevent more than 45,000 metric tons of CO2 emissions per year. This includes measures to reduce natural gas, hydrogen and steam consumption as well as more effective catalytic reduction of nitrous oxide. Enhanced heat integration with additional heat exchangers at a plant at our site in Yeosu, South Korea, led to a reduction of 9,000 metric tons CO2 per year. Our site in Camaçari, Brazil, reduced its natural gas consumption of the waste heat boiler and safety flares by optimizing controls, cutting CO2 emissions by more than 5,000 metric tons per year.

Low-emission steam generation

Alongside electricity, steam generation is an important component of our energy supply. In the medium to long term, new technologies should make a significant contribution to reducing CO2, for example by recovering energy from waste heat in our production and infrastructure facilities. In this context, we are examining various concepts such as using electric heat pumps and e-boilers as well as electrifying steam drives. We made initial progress toward low-emission steam generation in the reporting year: In 2024, BASF received funding approval from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action for constructing the world’s largest industrial heat pump, permitting emission-free steam generation at its site in Ludwigshafen, Germany. The planned heat pump will have a capacity of up to 500,000 metric tons of steam per year. The waste heat, which is used as a thermal energy source, is generated during the cooling and cleaning of process gases in one of the two at the site. Emission-free steam is generated using electricity from renewable sources and will primarily be used for producing formic acid. This offers the potential to use the heat pump to reduce greenhouse gas emissions produced by up to 98%. A smaller proportion of the emission-free steam is supplied to other BASF production plants via the steam network at the site. In total, the heat pump, which is scheduled to start operations in 2027, will reduce up to 100,000 metric tons of CO2 per year at the company’s headquarters.

In addition, we are examining the use of geothermal energy at our site in Ludwigshafen, Germany, as part of a strategic partnership with Vulcan Energy. Our partner has been performing initial seismic measurements in the Upper Rhine Graben since early 2025. Assuming a successful outcome to exploration in the Upper Rhine Graben, heat pumps could harness the geothermal energy to generate emission-free steam. With a potential output of 300 megawatts of thermal energy, around 4 million metric tons of this crucial energy carrier for the chemical industry could be produced per year. This would prevent roughly 800,000 metric tons of CO2 emissions.

We are also focusing on low-emission steam generation at our site in Schwarzheide, Germany. The goal there is to construct and operate a power-to-heat plant together with transmission systems operator 50Hertz. The plant will convert electricity from renewable sources into process heat. The planned plant consists of a 25-megawatt electrode boiler and is scheduled to commence operations at the end of 2026.

Climate-smart technologies

To further abate CO2 emissions, we are also developing completely new technologies for emission-free and low-emission production and are planning to scale them as far as possible from 2030 onward. These technologies will need large volumes of electricity from renewable sources in order to realize their full potential. The main focus here is on basic chemicals, which are often still emissions-intensive to produce. This is the case with steam crackers, for example, which use large amounts of energy to break down crude petroleum into olefins and aromatics – both important groups of substances for numerous chemical value chains. The cracking reaction requires high temperatures of around 850°C, which until now have been achieved by burning natural gas. Heating concepts using electricity from renewable sources could reduce process-related emissions by at least 90% in future compared to today’s conventional technologies. In 2024, together with our partners SABIC and Linde, we commissioned a demonstration plant for electrically heated steam cracker furnaces at our site in Ludwigshafen, Germany.18 This is where we are testing this new process, and associated direct and indirect heating concepts, on an industrial scale. The prototype is completely integrated into one of the two existing steam crackers at the site.

Another important basic material in the chemical industry is hydrogen, which we have so far mainly used as a raw material. One common but emissions-intensive way of obtaining hydrogen is steam reforming. We are testing an alternative process – methane pyrolysis – in Ludwigshafen, Germany. This process is virtually emission-free if renewable energy is used and requires considerably less electricity compared with other methods such as water electrolysis. We successfully tested a new reactor concept at the test plant, which was commissioned in 2021, and demonstrated stable operations. This has overcome the first important technical hurdle for further scaling. We also continued construction of a PEM19 (proton exchange membrane) water electrolyser with a capacity of 54 megawatts at the Ludwigshafen site in Germany with Siemens Energy. The plant went into operation in March 2025. Powered by electricity from renewable energy sources, the electrolyser produces up to 8,000 metric tons of emission-free hydrogen and thus reduces greenhouse gas emissions at the site by up to 72,000 metric tons per year. BASF will primarily use the hydrogen produced as a raw material for the manufacture of products with a reduced Product Carbon Footprint. We also agreed a partnership with Envision Energy, a leading provider of sustainable technologies, at the beginning of 2024. The objective is to drive forward the conversion of green hydrogen and CO2 into e-methanol, a more sustainable energy source. BASF is contributing its catalyst technologies expertise. In addition, we are expecting new hydrogen applications to emerge in the future, such as its use as an independent or a basic material for sustainable energy carriers, and that demand for hydrogen is likely to increase as a result. Access to large quantities of low-emission or emission-free hydrogen at competitive costs is therefore becoming increasingly important for BASF.

Another focus area of our technological development is carbon capture and storage (CCS). Together with partners, we are examining an industrial CCS project at the Antwerp site in Belgium (Kairos@C) as the first phase of the Antwerp@C project, which could enable BASF to prevent the release of emissions from production of up to 1 million metric tons of CO2 into the atmosphere every year.

Actions along our value chain

As part of our supplier management, we continuously review compliance with our required criteria when selecting suppliers and assessing new and existing supplier relationships. We urge our suppliers to reduce CO2 emissions. We arrange for third parties to evaluate suppliers with a high sustainability risk using either on-site audits or sustainability assessments by rating agency EcoVadis. Supplier assessment is mainly performed as part of the chemical industry’s Together for Sustainability initiative. Depending on business requirements, we perform our own Responsible Care audits at selected contract manufacturers if material risks have been identified with respect to environmental protection. This also covers the topic of CO2 emissions.

We launched the Supplier CO2 Management Program in 2021 to achieve transparency with respect to our raw materials-related emissions. The goal is to obtain a more accurate data base and to better manage and reduce emissions in the supply chain. In a first step, we have requested the Product Carbon Footprints (PCFs) of our raw materials since then and support our suppliers in determining these, for example, by sharing our knowledge of assessment and calculation methods with them. Since the start of the program, we have asked more than 1,900 suppliers, accounting for around 80% of our raw materials-related greenhouse gas emissions. After around three years, we have validated PCFs for more than 1,700 of our raw materials. This corresponds to a coverage of almost 30% in relation to the greenhouse gas emissions of our raw materials. We are working to further enhance the transparency of the PCFs for our raw materials.

In addition, we launched the next phase of our Supplier CO2 Management Program in 2024, so as to agree PCF reduction pathways with our suppliers. We use dialog forums to exchange with suppliers about opportunities, challenges and BASF’s specific expectations regarding PCF reductions. One example are the BASF Supplier Days that were held on the topic of Scope 3.1 emissions for the first time in 2024 in Ludwigshafen, Germany (Europe Region) and São Paulo, Brazil (South America Region). The format is to be rolled out to regions Asia Pacific and North America as well in 2025. We are also enhancing our purchasing processes and establishing PCFs as a relevant criterion for raw materials in the procurement requirement.

To replace fossil raw materials, we signed a long-term purchase contract for certified biomethane with ENGIE in 2024. This will be used at our Verbund sites in Antwerp, Belgium, and Ludwigshafen, Germany. Consequently, we will be able to reduce the carbon footprint of sales products in sectors such as the automotive, packaging and detergent industries using our mass balance approach (see E5 Sourcing and use of raw materials, Mass balance approach). In another project, we have agreed an innovative approach to reducing the carbon footprint of the products from Graphit Kropfmühl, a subsidiary of AMG Critical Materials N.V. We supply the company with Guarantees of Origins for electricity from renewable sources, reducing the PCF of the graphite produced. We then use the graphite as a raw material for a reduced-PCF variant of our insulation material Neopor®.

In addition to reducing our raw materials-related emissions (Scope 3.1), we are taking targeted measures to reduce Scope 3 emissions along the entire value chain. To reduce the emissions from transporting our products (Scope 3.9), the Monomers division has developed a shipment emissions dashboard that enables us to share standardized, reliable data on shipment-related emissions with our customers and identify the most sustainable means of transportation. Moreover, we rely on product adaptations to reduce emissions from the use of sold products (Scope 3.11): For example, climate-damaging blowing agents for foaming polyurethane foams can now be largely dispensed within the downstream value chain. Thanks to these and other measures, we have been able to reduce our emissions from the use of sold products (Scope 3.11) by around 73% since 2018.20 We also want to reduce emissions resulting from the disposal of our products (Scope 3.12). This can be done, for example, through the increased use of renewable raw materials or circular solutions (see E5 Strategy and Governance). Both ensure that less and less CO2 pollutes the atmosphere throughout the life cycle of our products.

Product Carbon Footprints

In 2024, we further expanded our portfolio of products with a certified reduced carbon footprint. These include ammonia and urea products and the intermediate butanediol, which our customers process in the manufacture of textile fibers, solvents and engineering plastics. Since the end of 2024, we are offering our customers bio-based and biomass balance-based ethyl acrylate – a more sustainable alternative for use in manufacturing adhesives and coatings, among other things. We already offer net-zero carbon footprint versions of some of our products; these include the polyamide Ultramid® and AdBlue®, an exhaust gas reducing agent for diesel engines, which we offer as Ultramid® ZeroPCF and AdBlue® ZeroPCF by BASF. These lower PCFs are primarily made possible by the substitution of fossil raw materials. For example, we use partially or fully renewable, waste-based or recycled raw materials to produce low PCF and zero PCF products. These include castor oil, biomethane or pyrolysis oil from plastic waste. These alternative resources often have a lower carbon footprint compared with fossil raw materials. The alternative resources are allocated to the end product using the mass balance approach (see E5 Sourcing and use of raw materials, Mass balance approach). Furthermore, we use electricity from renewable sources to reduce our PCFs.

The digital methodology we have developed to calculate PCFs meets general life cycle analysis standards such as ISO 14040, ISO 14044 and ISO 14067, as well as the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Product Standard. A certification from TÜV Rheinland confirms that our calculation method and reporting fully comply with the requirements of Together for Sustainability (TfS). We make our automated PCF calculation approach available to interested industry players through partnerships. At the same time, we are involved in various initiatives to drive transparency, harmonization and standardization across the industry. This also takes place as part of TfS, where we have been involved in the creation and revision of a uniform guideline for calculating the carbon footprint of products in the chemical industry. This enables the climate impact of products to be directly compared and evaluated based on a standardized approach. Harmonizing the approaches used to calculate PCFs allows us to better steer greenhouse gas emissions that arise during the extraction of raw materials or the manufacture of precursors. A digital solution developed by TfS and Siemens for sharing PCF data between companies was launched in October 2024. We have been migrating our queries to this solution since the end of 2024. Equally, it has been possible to share data within the Catena-X network, in which we work together with partners in the automotive value chain, since 2024.

16 Adjustment of the capacity published in the BASF Report 2023 due to project-related changes

17 Relevant sites are selected based on the amount of primary energy used and local energy prices.

18 The project has been granted €14.8 million from Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK) under the Decarbonization in Industry funding program. It is also being financed by the European Union via the NextGenerationEU fund.

19 The project is funded by Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK) and the Federal State of Rhineland-Palatinate.

20 BASF operations without oil and gas business

Global Targets

As an energy-intensive company that generates and consumes energy in the form of electricity and steam and that processes fossil raw materials, we are responsible for greenhouse gas emissions that negatively impact the climate (see also Results of the Double Materiality Assessment for E1). We accept this responsibility and are pursuing ambitious climate protection targets.21

Scope 1 and 2

Based on the 2018 base year, we want to achieve a 25% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from our production processes (Scope 1) and our energy purchases (Scope 2) by 2030.22 Our target focuses on emissions caused by our production and includes 96% of our gross Scope 1 emissions and 99% of our gross Scope 2 emissions. This means that we aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from 21.9 million metric tons to 16.4 million metric tons – despite our growth plans and the construction of a new Verbund site in southern China. This corresponds to a decrease of around 60% compared with 1990. Our long-term target is to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.22 We consider future developments in our Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions in line with the requirements of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. When recalculating the emissions from the base year, we have set ourselves a limit of 5% cumulative deviations from the base year.

Greenhouse gas emissions of the BASF Group (Scope 1 and 2)a

Million metric tons of CO2 equivalents

Greenhouse gas emissions of the BASF Group (Scope 1 and 2) (graphic)

a Scope 1 and Scope 2 (excluding the sale of energy to third parties). The target includes greenhouse gases according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, which are converted into CO2 equivalents (CO2e).

b The figure for 2023 has been adjusted to reflect updated data.

In 2024, the BASF Group’s emissions from production and energy purchases22 amounted to 17.0 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents (2023: 17.0 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents23). The slight rise in demand year on year lifted production volumes and thus resulted in higher CO2 emissions. At the same time, we increased the share of electricity from renewable sources compared with the previous year to 26% and, together with measures to increase energy and process efficiency, made a relevant contribution to reducing emissions. All in all, we have reduced our greenhouse gas emissions in BASF’s operations by 58% since 1990.

Scope 3.1

We set ourselves an ambitious Scope 3.1 target24 for our specific raw materials-related emissions in 2023. This includes around 92% of our Scope 3.1 emissions based on the base year. By 2030, we want to reduce these in relation to the purchasing volume specifically by 15% from the 2022 base year. Consequently, we are planning to reduce our specific Scope 3.1 emissions from 1.64 kilograms of CO2 per kilogram of raw materials purchased in the base year 2022 to 1.39 kilograms in the target year 2030.24 Through our commitment, we aim to keep our target-relevant Scope 3.1 emissions roughly constant at 50 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents by 2030 despite growing production. We have recalculated our base value for our Scope 3.1 target in line with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Scope 3 Standard, due to a change in secondary data and to the ongoing improvement in primary data availability under our Supplier CO2 Management Program (see Actions along our value chain). This preserves comparability between the base year and current business years.

Raw materials-related emissions from battery materials are initially excluded from the target. Battery materials make a significant contribution to reducing CO2 emissions and thus facilitate the transformation of the transportation sector. Required raw materials such as lithium, nickel and cobalt will not be able to be replaced by more sustainable alternatives in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, associated emissions cannot be reduced significantly in the short term. As soon as recyclable solutions come into play with the increase in available end-of-life batteries, we will include these raw materials in our target definition (for more information on our battery recycling activities, see E5 Recycling of mineral raw materials).

In the long term, we are striving to reduce Scope 3.1 emissions to an unavoidable minimum by 2050, thereby expanding our long-term net-zero target to include these greenhouse gas emissions.

Greenhouse gas emissions of the BASF Group (Scope 3.1)

Greenhouse gas emissions of the BASF Group (Scope 3.1) (graphic)

a Scope 3.1, raw materials excluding battery materials, excluding services, technical goods and greenhouse gas emissions from BASF trading business

b We adjusted the baseline in line with the TfS Guideline in the reporting year due to the availability of further primary data.

c The value for 2023 was adjusted due to increased data availability.

In 2024, specific Scope 3.1 emissions24 amounted to 1.58 kilograms of CO2 per kilogram of raw materials purchased (2023: 1.67 kilograms25). The reduction in specific emissions is mainly attributable to a change in the raw materials portfolio. In addition, first raw materials were purchased from suppliers who offer these with a lower PCF.

We monitor progress toward our targets annually as part of our strategic controlling activities.

For an overview of our greenhouse gas emissions – broken down by operational control and financial control – see table BASF Group’s greenhouse gas emissions according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Our projection of target-relevant Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions for 2025 can be found in the CO2 emissions forecast for the BASF Group.

Target setting was preceded by an analysis of expected business developments, external requirements relating to emission reduction targets and internal implementation opportunities, including the use of pilot plants to develop technical solutions. In addition, cost estimates were developed for planned actions. A Supplier CO2 Management Program was established and support was provided for the development of standards such as TfS before the Scope 3.1 target was introduced. This approach was designed to ensure that the targets were not only ambitious but also implementable. We discuss the sustainability topics that are material for BASF at regular meetings with external stakeholders forming part of our strategic stakeholder engagement activities, and in discussions with investors. In this way, stakeholder expectations are continuously taken into account in the development of strategic sustainability management approaches, targets and principles.

Carbon credits

As part of the above stated targets, we have committed to reducing our Scope 1, 2 and 3.1 emissions to net zero by 2050. Despite all our efforts, we expect there to be a residual share of emissions in 2050 that cannot be abated using technical or economic approaches. We are aiming to offset all remaining emissions by 2050 inclusive through high-quality, high-credibility nature-based and technical measures, such as the sequestration of CO2 into the soil through farming (carbon farming). We are planning to use ratings such as BeZero and Sylvera, and initiatives such as the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM), its Core Carbon Principles and carbon credits assessed using them. At the same time, we are developing internal standards for evaluating projects and considering whether to develop our own projects. We are also evaluating using/developing a project under the European Carbon Removal and Carbon Farming Certification Framework (CRCF). In view of this situation, we will likely use a portfolio of different credits, and will rely on well-known standards such as Verra and Gold Standard, but also credits under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and the CRCF. BASF did not use any carbon credits in the past business year.

21 We report on greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Standard as well as the sector-specific standard for the chemical industry. Our targets include future organic growth and investments. They are based on the scope of consolidation using the financial control method and are audited in the context of the annual report. For information on compatibility with the 1.5°C scenario, see Transition plan for climate change mitigation.

22 Scope 1 and Scope 2 (excluding the sale of energy to third parties). The emissions account for 96% of total Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions in relation to the base year. The target includes greenhouse gases according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, which are converted into CO2 equivalents (CO2e). Scope 2 emissions are calculated using the market-based approach in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Based on the aforementioned emission reduction levers, we assume a reduction in Scope 1 emissions of around 14% between 2018 and 2030. We aim to reduce Scope 2 emissions by around 75% in the same period. The target is aligned with limiting global warming to a global average of 1.5°C, and is thus science-based. It has not been externally audited.

23 The figure for 2023 has been adjusted to reflect updated data.

24 Scope 3.1, gross emissions from raw materials excluding battery materials, excluding services, technical goods and greenhouse gas emissions from BASF trading business. The emissions account for 52% of total Scope 3 emissions based on the 2024 business year. The target is not science-based and has not been externally audited. We adjusted the baseline in line with the TfS Guideline in the reporting year due to the availability of further primary data.

25 The value for 2023 was adjusted due to increased data availability.

Metrics

Energy supply

Our total energy consumption26 amounted to 75.6 million MWh in 2024. Total energy consumption includes fuel demand for our own energy generation and production plants, plus power and steam imports for our own use.

BASF Group’s energy consumption and mix

 

 

2024

Million MWh

 

Financial control

Operational control

Total energy consumption

 

75.6

74.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel consumption from renewable sources (biomass)

 

0.0

0.0

Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from renewable sources

 

3.6

3.6

Consumption of self-generated
nonfuel renewable energy

 

0.0

0.0

Total energy consumption from renewable sources

 

3.6

3.6

Share of renewable sources in total energy consumption

%

4.8

4.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel consumption from coal and coal products

 

1.1

1.1

Fuel consumption from crude oil and petroleum products

 

0.3

0.3

Fuel consumption from natural gas

 

33.7

33.0

Fuel consumption from other fossil sourcesa

 

27.7

27.5

Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, or cooling from fossil sources

 

9.0

9.3

Total energy consumption from fossil sources

 

71.9

71.2

Share of fossil sources in total energy consumption

%

95.2

95.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total energy consumption from nuclear sourcesb

 

0.0

0.0

Share of nuclear sources in total energy consumption

%

0.0

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Energy production from renewable sources

 

0.0

0.0

Energy production from fossil sources

 

43.8

43.0

Energy intensity (total energy consumption per sales revenue)c

million MWh/billion €

1.16

1.15

a

Residues from chemical production plants that cannot be reused in the BASF Verbund.

b

Only contracts aimed at the use of nuclear energy are included.

c

Energy intensity is determined on the basis of the “manufacturing” high climate impact sector. The sales revenue from high climate impact sectors corresponds to the sales revenue in Results of Operations.

The generation of our own steam and power in highly efficient and predominately natural gas-based combined heat and power plants and our Verbund system, are key to CO2-optimized energy supply at our sites. In the latter, waste heat generated during one plant’s production process is used as energy in other plants. Thanks to combined heat and power generation and our continuously optimized Energy Verbund, we were able to prevent a total of 6.1 million metric tons of CO2 emissions27 in 2024 compared with separate, fossil-based power and steam generation without the use of the Verbund system.

Corporate carbon footprint

BASF has published a comprehensive corporate carbon footprint every year since 2008. This reports on all emissions along the value chain – from raw materials extraction to production and disposal. We are continually working to reduce greenhouse gas emissions both in our own production and, together with our partners, along the value chain (see Strategy and governance).

In 2024, our greenhouse gas emissions according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol including Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions28 amounted to 17.948 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents (2023: 17.902 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents29). Of this amount, 87% were Scope 1 emissions (2023: 87%) and 13% were Scope 2 emissions (2023: 13%). Carbon dioxide was by far the largest component and accounted for 98% of emissions (2023: 98%).

Scope 3 emissions arising upstream and downstream of our operations in the value chain are calculated in accordance with the Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard published by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol and the WBCSD Guidance for Accounting and Reporting Corporate GHG Emissions in the Chemical Sector Value Chain (WBCSD Chemicals). For 2024, we calculated Scope 3 emissions of around 92 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents.30 There was an increase in total emissions along the BASF value chain in 2024 due to the slight year-on-year increase in production volumes. The share of emissions that were calculated using primary data31 amounted to 21% in the business year.

CO2 emissions along the BASF value chain in 2024a

Million metric tons of CO2 equivalents

CO2 emissions along the BASF value chain in 2024 (graphic)

a According to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Standard; Scope 1, 2 and 3; reported categories within Scope 3 are shown in parentheses. Scope 3 emissions in category 10 (“Processing of sold products”) are not reported according to the standard for the chemical sector. Only direct use phase emissions are reported in the customer category (Scope 3.11). Excluding greenhouse gas emissions from BASF trading business.

The largest contribution to emissions along the value chain in 2024 was in category 3.1 (purchased raw materials and technical goods and services) at 52 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents.30 To calculate these upstream greenhouse gas emissions, we use both primary data from our suppliers from the Supplier CO2 Management Program (see Actions along our value chain) and industrial averages and values from external databases.32 Apart from raw materials-related emissions, the disposal of our products (Scope 3.12) accounts for the second-largest share of our Scope 3 emissions at around 24 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents.

BASF Group’s greenhouse gas emissions according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol

 

 

 

Retrospective

Milestones and target years

Million metric tons of CO2 equivalents

2024

2023

Difference 2024/2023

Base year

2025

2030

2050

Reduction each year on average

 

Financial control

Operational control

Financial control

Operational control

Financial control

Operational control

Financial control

Financial control

Financial control

Financial control

Financial control

Scope 1a

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

CO2 (carbon dioxide)

14.402

14.202

14.345

0%

17.025

N2O (nitrous oxide)

0.176

0.172

0.239

–26%

0.667

CH4 (methane)

0.027

0.022

0.025

+8%

0.027

HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons)

0.035

0.035

0.026

+35%

0.091

PFCs (perfluorocarbons)

0

0

0

0%

0

SF6 (sulfur hexafluoride)

0.001

0.001

0.000

.

0.000

NF3 (nitrogen trifluoride)

0

0

0

0%

0

TotalZ

14.641

14.432

14.635

0%

17.810

Sale of energy to third parties (Scope 1)b

0.874

0.746

0.927

–6%

0.773

Scope 1 emissions (nonproduction companies)

0.037

0.038

Gross Scope 1 emissions

15.552

15.216

15.562

0%

18.583

Percentage of Scope 1 emissions from regulated emission trading schemesc

66%

66%

Scope 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

Scope 2 emissions (nonproduction companies)d

0.044

0.044

Location-based Scope 2 emissions (production companies)

3.520

3.587

3.317

+6%

3.747

Market-based Scope 2 emissions (production companies)Z

2.352

2.416

2.340e

+1%

4.067

Gross location-based Scope 2 emissions

3.564

3.631

3.317

+7%

3.747

Gross market-based Scope 2 emissions

2.396

2.460

2.340

+2%

4.067

Share of electricity consumption by market-based calculationf

46%

47%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total target-relevant Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissionsZ

16.993

16.975e

0%

21.877

16.4

0

2.1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scope 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

Total gross Scope 3 emissions

91.64

94.49

1 – Purchased goods and services

52.34

54.13

54.13g

0

2 – Capital goods

1.84

1.81

3 – Activities related to fuels and energies (not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2)

2.63

2.61

4 – Upstream transportation and distribution

2.32

2.32

5 – Waste generated in operations

0.76

0.75

6 – Business travel

0.12

0.12

7 – Employee commuting

0.20

0.20

8 – Upstream leased assets

0.15

0.16

9 – Downstream transportation

1.49

1.53

11 – Use of sold products

3.01

3.01

12 – End-of-life treatment of sold products

24.23

24.75

15 – Investments

2.56

3.12

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total emissions (site-based)

110.76

113.34

Total emissions (market-based)

109.59

112.17

Other metrics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Biogenic CO2 emissions from the combustion or bio-degradation of biomass (Scope 1)h

0.140

0.140

0.112

+25%

Biogenic Scope 2 emissions from the combustion of biomassi

0.053

0

Biogenic Scope 3 emissions from the combustion or bio-degradation of biomass in the value chainj

1.23

1.23

Offsettingk

0

0

0

0%

0

Total emissions (location-based) per sales revenue (million metric tons CO2e/billion €)l

1.697

1.737

Total emissions (market-based) per sales revenue (million metric tons CO2e/billion €)l

1.679

1.719

a

Emissions of N2O, CH4, SF6 and NF3 are converted into CO2 emissions using the global warming potential (GWP) factor. GWP factors are based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007, Errata table 2012 for the reporting year 2018, and IPCC 2014 for the reporting year 2024, in line with the requirements of the EU ETS methodology. HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons) and PFCs (perfluorocarbons) are calculated using the GWP factors for their individual components.

b

Includes sales to BASF Group companies; as a result, emissions reported under Scope 2 can be considered twice in some cases.

c

The emissions trading schemes from the following states/unions of states were used in the calculation: China, Germany, Europe, Shanghai, Switzerland, South Korea. Information subject to official review, which had not yet been completed at the time of the editorial deadline.

d

The emissions are estimated on the basis of location-based emission factors, since no information on market-based factors is available.

e

The comparative figure for 2023 has been adjusted to reflect updated data.

f

The market- and location-based concept is applied exclusively to electricity.

g

We adjusted the baseline in line with the TfS Guideline in the reporting year due to the availability of further primary data.

h

The emissions are disclosed outside of Scope 1 in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Standard.

i

The emissions are disclosed outside of Scope 2 in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Standard.

j

The emissions are disclosed outside of Scope 3 in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Standard. Only biogenic emissions from category 3.12 are included in the calculation. We do not have any information about other biogenic emissions along our value chain.

k

Offsetting relates to carbon credits utilized in the reporting year.

l

The sales revenue used to calculate the GHG intensity corresponds to the sales revenue in Results of Operations.

Z

Emissions labeled with this footnote are included in our Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions target.

BASF reports its Scope 2 emissions using the market-based approach in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. In 2024, the share of total electricity consumption determined in accordance with the market-based approach was 45.9%. Contractual instruments such as energy attribute certificates (Guarantee of Origins, I-RECs), also in the form of power purchase agreements, local contracts to source renewable energy and supplier-specific electricity labels are used for this purpose.

Information on methodologies, significant assumptions, factors and calculation tools that are used to calculate direct greenhouse gas emissions can be found among other places in General Disclosures in the Sustainability Statement. We use supplier data where possible to calculate our market-based Scope 2 emissions. Where such data is not available, we rely on country-specific residual mix and grid-average emission factors respectively. In this case we use information from the International Energy Agency and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, among other sources. When calculating our Scope 3 emissions, we prefer to use primary data in particular for category 3.1. In the case of secondary data, we rely on leading life cycle analysis databases.

The following table explains the calculation approaches used for the individual Scope 3 categories.

Calculation methodologies for Scope 3 categories

Scope 3 category

Calculation methodology

1

Purchased goods and services

The raw materials-related Scope 3.1 emissions are calculated per raw material, purchasing BASF company and supplier in those cases in which a supplier-specific PCF is available for the raw material. If no supplier-specific PCF is available, we use PCF values from databases (industry association data, GaBi, ecoinvent), publications or expert estimates. We record the packaging used globally and break it down into categories for which life cycle inventories were created. The data for technical goods and services is recorded by Procurement. Based on the SCI (Standard Industrial Classification) system, the segments are assigned a code, which is used to calculate emissions using emission factors from DEFRA (the United Kingdom Government’s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs).

2

Capital goods

See the calculation for emissions from technical goods and services (3.1)

3

Activities related to fuels and energies (not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2)

Fuel used and purchased volumes of electricity and steam are captured annually in an internal BASF EHS database. Emissions from fuel usage are calculated using regionally differentiated emission factors from the GaBi database, based on the type of fuel involved (coal, natural gas, LPG, light and heavy heating oil).
The fuels used to generate purchased electricity and steam are determined using regional average values, after which the emissions are calculated in the same way as for purchased fuels. A conversion efficiency of 37% for electricity and 82.5% for steam is assumed.

4

Upstream transportation and distribution

Emissions are calculated on the basis of emission factors from EcoTransIT. Where no information about transportation distances is available, these are estimated by experts. It is assumed that almost all goods are transported by truck. Exceptions to this are the transportation of raw materials and naphtha in Europe and the transportation of all industrial gases and natural gas. In these cases the assumptions published by CEFIC (the European Chemical Industry Council) are used.

5

Waste generated in operations

A distinction is made in waste disposal between solid waste and wastewater. In addition, a distinction is made between different disposal routes for solid waste. It is assumed that the carbon content of solid waste corresponds to the average carbon content of the purchased raw materials. In the case of incineration, total conversion into CO2 is assumed. In the cases of incineration plus energy recovery and landfill, emission factors from the ELCD (European Reference Life Cycle Database) are used.
CO2 emissions from wastewater are calculated on the basis of experts’ estimates of the carbon content. Potential nitrous oxide emissions are not taken into consideration. In the case of sewage sludge treatment, only disposal via incineration and the resulting CO2 emissions are included.
It is assumed that no landfill is used and hence that no methane emissions arise.

6

Business travel

Data is captured by the travel agents commissioned by BASF and by other mobility service providers. If no primary data is available from these service providers, we use emission factors from DEFRA (flights, rental cars and trains) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (train travel and rental cars).

7

Employee commuting

Emissions are determined on the basis of a survey of BASF SE employees and then estimated on this basis for all employees in Europe.
We use statistical data for the other regions. DEFRA data are used for the emission factors in Europe and Asia Pacific, and EPA data for North and South America.

8

Upstream leased assets

This category comprises leased cars, leased office and storage space and leased equipment. Average values provided by the manufacturers are used for leased cars, broken down by drive system and engine size.
In the case of electric vehicles we use the regional CO2 emission factors from the IEA (International Energy Agency). Since data availability varies, we extrapolate global emissions on the basis of BASF SE data and the number of staff. Emissions for leased office and storage space are calculated using the IEA’s regional emission factors for electricity and internal standard values for steam. Energy consumption is assumed by region per m2 on the basis of average values. Emissions from leased equipment are calculated in the same way as emissions from technical goods (3.1).

9

Downstream transportation

Greenhouse gas emissions from BASF’s freight transports are calculated as well-to-wheel (WtW) emissions using the EcoTransIT World (ETW) IT solution, drawing on transportation data from BASF’s ERP system.

11

Use of sold products

This category comprises direct emissions in BASF products’ use phase. Since most products undergo further processing, this primarily relates to CO2 that is passed on to the food industry; emissions from blowing agents needed to produce polyurethane foams; emissions from the production of polyurethanes from polyol and isocyanates; and emissions from the use of fertilizers, urea and carbonates (baking powder). We use our own purchase and sales volume data to calculate the emissions.

12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

Sales volumes and the carbon content of BASF’s sales products are used to calculate emissions. It is assumed that the products are disposed of in the regions in which they were sold. Regional differences in disposal routes are taken into account. The annual shares of the different disposal routes for municipal waste are taken from the following sources: Eurostat, OECDStat, UNStats and IDB. In the case of waste disposal by incineration or landfill, it is assumed that all the carbon contained in the product is ultimately emitted as CO2.

15

Investments

Greenhouse gas emissions from joint ventures and associated companies accounted for using the equity method and not included in BASF’s Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. Emissions from production sites are captured directly using a database query.

Internal carbon pricing

We use shadow prices in the form of price projections to factor in the costs of CO2 emissions when assessing investment projects. These shadow prices differ by region (Europe, Asia and North America) and represent the expected developments in these economic areas in the decades up to 2050. In view of the different ways in which the global economy could potentially develop, BASF currently uses three different scenarios (for more on the scenarios see Climate-related physical and transition risks), which are also used to analyze transition risks. The scenarios and the prices derived from them were developed together with an external cooperation partner. The fundamental drivers for the scenarios are different societal preferences and, building on these, climate and economic policy objectives. The result is a price per metric ton of CO2 equivalents of up to €340, depending on the year. This is used for all Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions caused by investments (capex) by our companies worldwide, and is included in the cost calculations. As a result, the emissions caused or reduced are directly included in the decision-making process. This favors investments in low-emission measures and measures that contribute to reducing emissions.

Since the investments will be made in the future, they are not included in the reported emissions for the business year. Consequently, the Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions for the current year covered by shadow prices amount to 0 metric tons of CO2 equivalents in each case. In the Consolidated Financial Statements, the shadow prices were only used for the valuation of the climate protection agreement that BASF concluded with the Federal Republic of Germany to fund a heat pump at the Ludwigshafen site.

26 Consolidation by financial control; adjusted to include by-product streams that are used as energy sources in the process plants compared with the prior-year figure

27 Calculation basis: electricity conversion efficiency of conventional power plants 45%; steam generation efficiency 90%

28 Market-based approach, including sale of energy to third parties

29 The figure for 2023 has been adjusted to reflect updated data.

30 In 2024, we adjusted the calculation of Scope 3 emissions in category 3.1 due to increased availability of primary and secondary data. For additional information on the calculation method, see basf.com/corporate_carbon_footprint

31 Primary data in this case is data provided directly by our partners in the value chain.

32 The database values are updated on an annual basis. Significant changes in these values are reflected accordingly in our calculations.

CO2 equivalents
CO2 equivalents are units for measuring the impact of greenhouse gas emissions on the greenhouse effect. A factor known as the global warming potential (GWP) shows the impact of the individual gases compared with CO2 as the reference value.
Circular economy
The circular economy is a regenerative system in which economic growth is decoupled from the consumption of finite resources. The circular economy is based on the fundamental principles of preventing waste and pollution, using products and materials for as long as possible and regenerating natural systems at the same time.
Double materiality
Double materiality as defined by the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) is a concept that is applied in the materiality assessment. The principle of double materiality looks at sustainability aspects from two perspectives: 1. Impact materiality, which determines the actual and potential positive and negative impacts of business activities have on various sustainability topics. 2. Financial materiality, which considers the opportunities and risks of sustainability topics for a company’s financial position.
EU taxonomy
The European Union (EU) strives to be climate neutral by 2050 as part of the Green Deal. The EU taxonomy serves as an instrument for that purpose. It provides a common classification system for economic activities based on their substantial contribution to environmental objectives. The EU Taxonomy Regulation obliges large companies, among others, to disclose sales revenues as well as capital and operating expenditures that contribute to at least one of the six environmental objectives listed in the taxonomy system.
Just transition
Just transition refers to a concept for a socially just transformation of a social and economic order toward climate neutrality. To this end, ecological, economic and social challenges are to be given equal consideration, with a particular focus on vulnerable populations.
Policy
In this report, we use the word policy or requirement to describe internal frameworks that set out the fundamental guidelines of our company. At BASF, policies are set by the Board of Executive Directors and define principles relating to a specific topic. Separate requirements define the processes for implementing a policy.
Steam cracker
A steam cracker is a plant in which steam is used to “crack” naphtha (petroleum) or natural gas. The resulting petrochemicals are the raw materials used to produce most of BASF’s products.
Value chain
A value chain describes the successive steps in a production process: from raw materials through various intermediate steps, such as transportation and production, to the finished product.

This content fulfills the Disclosure Requirements of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). The  ESRS Index gives an overview of the references to the ESRSs in this report.

Please note

The target-relevant Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions data listed in this chapter – unlike the other sustainability-related indicators – is part of the statutory audit and has been audited with reasonable assurance.

Chart Generator

Key figures comparison

(Consolidated) Sustainability Statement

Overview of (Consolidated) Sustainability Statement

Topic filter

No filter selected, 0 Results for